The Impact of Tribalism on Information Technology and How to Overcome It
- Olu Osunkiyesi

- Jun 1, 2024
- 5 min read
Updated: Jun 26, 2024
Understanding Tribalism in Information Technology
In the realm of Information Technology (IT), the term "tribalism" denotes the inclination of individuals or factions within an organisation to establish close-knit, exclusive communities or "tribes" that give precedence to their particular tools, technologies, vendors, or methodologies at the expense of oranisational needs. This conduct has the potential to create divisions within the organisation, resulting in distinct teams or departments operating in isolation, each committed to their favored systems and procedures without sufficient regard for or alignment with the overarching organisational framework.

Various Manifestations of Tribalism in IT
There are several ways in which Tribalism can manifest in IT, this includes:
1. Technology Preferences: Different teams may exhibit preferences for specific programming languages, platforms, or software solutions, resulting in inconsistencies and compatibility issues throughout the organisation.
2. Methodological Disparities: Conflicting methodologies or practices, such as varying project management approaches (e.g., Agile vs. Waterfall), can create friction and inefficiencies.
3. Complex Architecture: An intricate ecosystem of applications, infrastructures, and environments that has evolved without synergy, making it challenging and costly to support, manage, or scale.
4. Data Silos: Segregated data storage and processing systems that impede data sharing and collaboration across the organisation.
5. Communication Challenges: Limited interaction and collaboration among teams can diminish the overall effectiveness of IT projects and innovation.
6. Prolonged Time to Market: Delays in launching products or features due to complex IT architectures or convoluted overarching processes.
Exploring the Origins of Tribalism
Below are some key factors contributing to the prevalence of tribalism in the realm of IT:
1. Emotional Influences:
Personal Convictions: Firmly held personal or group beliefs and preferences can hinder the ability to prioritise the broader organisational objectives.
2. Technological Preferences and Expertise:
Devotion to Languages and Frameworks: Teams often exhibit strong affinities towards specific programming languages (such as Python vs. Java) or frameworks (like Angular vs. React).
Tool and Platform Allegiance: Favoritism towards particular tools (e.g., Docker vs. Vagrant) or platforms (e.g., AWS vs. Azure) without a strong linkage to overall business objectives can contribute to tribalistic tendencies.
3. Influence of Corporate Culture and Policies:
Established Norms: Organizations frequently standardise their technological choices, leading to the formation of internal factions centered around these technologies.
Proprietary Solutions: The development of custom in-house tools and frameworks can foster tribal behavior within a company.
4. Impact of Innovation Cycles:
Embracing Novel Technologies: Early adopters of emerging technologies often unite to champion and bolster the adoption of these innovations.
Resistance to Change: Conversely, there exist professional groups resistant to embracing new technologies, favoring established solutions instead.
5. Psychological Influences:
Identity and Affiliation: Individuals frequently derive a sense of identity and belonging by aligning with specific tools, technologies, vendors, or methodologies.
Cognitive Biases: Confirmation bias may lead individuals to overestimate the merits of their chosen tools, technologies, vendors, or methods.
6. Economic Considerations:
Market Demand for Skills: The job market's demand for particular skills can foster the formation of tribes centered around those proficiencies.
Skill Investment: Professionals dedicate substantial time and effort to mastering specific technologies, establishing a vested interest in their continuous utilisation and success.
The Adverse Effects of Tribalism
Although tribalism, when appropriately managed within an organisation, can cultivate a sense of identity and community, it often emerges in detrimental contexts, resulting in the following consequences and impacts:
1. Silos and Fragmentation:
Diminished Collaboration: Teams may isolate themselves, hindering communication and cooperation among different factions.
Redundant Efforts: Separate teams might independently tackle similar projects, causing duplication of work and resource wastage.
Inconsistent Practices: Various tribes may establish their own procedures and norms, leading to inconsistencies and integration difficulties.
2. Innovation Stagnation:
Resistance to Change: Tribes may cling to specific tools, technologies, vendors, or methodologies, resisting new approaches and innovations.
Narrow Perspectives: Tribalism can create echo chambers that restrict the consideration of diverse ideas, limiting exposure to varied viewpoints and innovations.
3. Inefficiencies:
Uneven Resource Allocation: Resources may be unevenly distributed, with some tribes receiving disproportionate support, resulting in imbalances.
Project Delays: Lack of coordination and collaboration can cause project delays and missed deadlines.
4. Conflict and Rivalry:
Internal Competition: Tribes may engage in competition rather than cooperation, leading to internal conflicts and reduced overall productivity.
Decreased Morale: Prolonged conflicts and lack of unity can diminish team morale and job satisfaction.
5. Knowledge Hoarding:
Restricted Knowledge Sharing: Tribe members may withhold knowledge from other groups, creating gaps in understanding and skills organization-wide.
Skill Disparities: This can result in skill gaps, where certain teams are highly specialised in specific areas while lacking expertise in others.
6. Customer Experience:
Inconsistent User Experience: Different teams may deliver inconsistent user experiences across products or services due to varying standards and practices.
Customer Dissatisfaction: Such inconsistencies can lead to customer dissatisfaction, negatively impacting the organization's reputation and financial performance.

Strategies for Combating Tribalism in IT
Below are key approaches to address tribalism within the IT environment:
1. Cultivate a Unified Company Vision
Top-down Approach: Establish a cohesive strategy that is impartial to tools, technologies, and vendors, prioritising organisational goals over individual or group affiliations.
Shared Objectives: Define and communicate common goals that all teams are striving to achieve, fostering alignment and reducing factionalism.
Leadership Role Modeling: Encourage leaders to demonstrate cross-functional collaboration and underscore the significance of a unified vision.
2. Foster a Culture of Ongoing Learning
Educational Initiatives: Provide training programs and workshops covering various technologies and methodologies.
Internal Knowledge Exchange: Establish a framework for regular internal knowledge-sharing, enabling team members to present new technologies or methodologies they have acquired.
3. Embrace Flexibility and Adaptability
Cultivate Change: Promote a culture that embraces change and encourages experimentation with new technologies and methodologies.
Skills Development: Support initiatives for reskilling and upskilling to help teams adapt to evolving technologies and industry trends.
4. Leverage External Perspectives
Consultation and Expertise: Engage external consultants and experts to offer unbiased insights and challenge entrenched viewpoints.
Industry Collaboration: Advocate for participation in industry groups, conferences, and forums to gain external perspectives.
5. Enhance Transparency and Accountability
Transparent Decision-Making: Ensure transparency in decision-making processes, involving diverse stakeholders in the decision-making process.
Accountability Frameworks: Implement structures that hold teams and individuals accountable for collaboration and knowledge sharing.
The Impact of Tribalism on Security Investment
The detrimental effects of tribalism within the realm of Information Technology extend to IT security, posing a significant obstacle to the efficient allocation and delivery of security investments.
1. Tribalism encourages the development of disjointed security strategies and redundant efforts among teams.
2. This isolated approach results in inconsistent security capabilities, heightening organisational susceptibility to risks stemming from uncoordinated security measures.
3. Resource distribution becomes inefficient when investments are guided by individual team preferences rather than by capabilities and comprehensive risk assessments, leading to increased expenses without proportional security enhancements.
4. The delivery of security services and capabilities is impeded or delayed due to conflicting perspectives and the inability to reach consensus, often resulting in deadlocks.
5. Consequently, tribalism undermines the overall security culture, diminishing the organisation's ability to effectively shield itself against evolving threats.
It is evident that tribalism represents a significant invincible cost for organisations, making it imperative to identify and address this issue to optimise security investments and bolster the organisation's security resilience.
Conclusion
Organisations must cultivate a culture of collaboration, establish transparent communication channels, and implement standards and practices that enhance interoperability and unity across all IT functions. Embracing a mindset focused solely on achieving business objectives is essential. This comprehensive strategy ensures that all facets of the organisation collaborate towards shared objectives, utilising optimal tools, technologies, vendors, and methodologies for an oganisation-wide advantage.
Tribalism often goes unnoticed as a significant barrier to the success of an organisation's security programme and a leading source of invincible costs. At Olustreet, we can offer assistance in navigating this intricate challenge and in unlocking the advantages of an all-encompassing and integrated approach. We invite you to reach out to us for further support.

Comments